UDC 681.326:519.713

https://doi.org/10.31721/2414-9055.2017.3.2.28

ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES AND RATIONALE OF CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS FOR MINING AND METALLURGICAL COMPLEX

Kupin A. I., ScD, Professor, Head of Computer 

Systems and Networks Department,

Muzyka I. O., PhD, Associate Professor of Computer 

Systems and Networks Department

SIHE “Kryvyi Rih National University”

Full text: (PDF)

Abstract. Overview of general Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) and technologies, analysis of potential possibilities for their application in the field of mining and metallurgical enterprises in Ukraine. The research objective is to analyze the possibilities of modern cyber-physical systems and other innovative approaches in the structure as a part of the concept “Industry 4.0” to improve the efficiency and competitiveness of domestic enterprises of mining-metallurgical complex (MMC). By applying the system analysis are investigated the main process stages and TP of domestic enterprises, identified promising areas for the implementation of the “unmanned production” on the basis of CPS. The obtained results can be applied for the implementation of projects intellectual production control.   Showed the modern tendency of creating a “smart production”, “smart products”, ”smart production methods” based on the concept of “Industry 4.0”. Presented a number of business processes and technological processes, automation of which is widely highlighted in the concept of “Industry 4.0”. It is primary and secondary production, logistics, marketing, procurement, maintenance control. Studied  the implementation of intelligent maintenance control system on the basis of CPS and other promising approaches to the concept of “Industry 4.0” in terms of large mining companies (such as Mining Enterprise and steel company “Metinvest Ukraine”, “Arcelor Mittal Kryvyi Rih”, etc.).

Key words: Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), Industry 4.0, Smart Factory, Key Performance Indicator (KPI).

References

  1. Amosha, A. I., Bolshakov, V. I., Minaev, A. A., Selezneva, Yu. S., Zbarazskaya, L. A., Makogon, Y. V., etc. Ukrainian steel industry: current challenges and prospects of development: monograph. Donetsk: National Academy of Sciences in Ukraine, Institute of economy of industry, 2013.
  2. Stalios, A., Folea, V., Cahill, E. Metallurgy made in and for Europe. The Perspective of Producers and End-Users Roadmap. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014.
  3. Khaitan et al. Design Techniques and Applications of Cyber Physical Systems: A Survey. IEEE Systems Journal, 2014.
  4. Suh S. C., Carbone J. N., Eroglu A. E. Applied CyberPhysical Systems. Springer, 2014.
  5. Lee, E. A., Seshia, S. A. Introduction to Embedded Systems – A Cyber-Physical Systems Approach, http://LeeSeshia.org, 2011.
  6. Wee, D., Breunig, M., Tann, V. Industry 4.0 after the initial hype. Where manufacturers are finding value and how they can best capture it. McKinsey Digital, 2016.
  7. Lee, J.; Bagheri, B., Kao, H. A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. ScienceDirect, Manufacturing Letters. 3 (2015): 18–23.
  8. Parmenter, D. Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing and Using Winning KPI’s. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
  9. ISO 22400-2:2014. Automation systems and integration – Key performance indicators (KPIs) for manufacturing operations management – Part 2: Definitions and descriptions. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber =54497.
  10. Kupin, A. I., Romanov, M. A., Savytskyi, O. I., Muzyka, I. O., Ruban, S. A., Kharlamenko V. Intelligent control of repair process of industrial facilities with distributed infrastructure on the basis of CPS. Materials Science II workshop “Cyber-Physical Systems: Achievements and Challenges”. Lviv Polytechnic, 2016р.